Compliance
Technology alignment for security, resilience and regulatory compliance
Risk reduction
Audit readiness
Transparent executive decision-making
Clarity and consistent execution
Regulatory pressure is mounting, and the need for security, resilience and auditable evidence is no longer optional. NIS2, DORA and ISO/IEC 27001 require clear interpretation, priorities based on the 80/20 principle, and consistent implementation.
Clarify requirements and practical implications
setting out the scope, roles, deadlines and penalties, with an impact assessment by area and service
Identify critical gaps and quick wins
Ensure auditable evidence and continuous visibility
by creating maturity, risk and audit readiness scorecards
Integrate compliance
Keep compliance alive and red tape free
We simplify compliance with added value
aiteris delivers practical, actionable, independent and value-driven compliance, powered by proprietary frameworks. It links legal requirements to real-world processes, effective controls and evidence for audit and supervision.
We translate legal requirements into concrete actions
We design controls and policies
We collect evidence and prepare dashboards
aiteris accelerators for executable compliance
When the priority is to translate NIS2 requirements into actions, controls and verifiable evidence, aiteris’ accelerators provide a structured approach to technological compliance and support decision-making with executive-level visibility.
IT360
Outline the current situation, critical gaps and the priorities that most effectively mitigate risk, providing an executive summary and a solid foundation to guide decision-making.
NIS2C360
Translate NIS2 requirements into concrete actions and auditable evidence.
accelerating what matters
Frequently Asked Questions about technology compliance
Do I need to address NIS2, DORA and ISO/IEC 27001 at the same time?
It depends on what applies to your business. The starting point is to clarify the relevant requirements and practical implications (scope, roles, deadlines and penalties), and then to prioritise measures that reduce risk and increase resilience, ensuring consistent implementation.
What counts as “auditable evidence”?
Verifiable evidence linked to requirements and effective controls, ready for supervision and audit, with short response times to inspection requests.
Which teams are responsible for IT, risk and operations?
It depends on the scope and the accountability model defined. The key is to separate roles and clarify who is responsible for oversight to ensure consistent implementation, integration with operations, and verifiable evidence.